What was one significant effect of the Hundred Years' War on European society

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

The loss of all English-held territory in France except Calais. A high number of casualties amongst the nobility, particularly in France. A decline in trade, especially English wool and Gascon wine. A great wave of taxes to pay for the war which contributed to social unrest in both countries


Related Questions

We are currently seeing an increase in home _________, where many household activities are being automated or controlled from a distance.
The value of the smartphone as a tool of assessment is that it may yield:__________
Presidents are generally thought to have advantages over Congress in conducting foreign policy because of the formal and informal powers of the presidency. Identify two formal constitutional powers of the President in making foreign policy.
The president of both Brazil and Mexico are chosen by __________.the kingpopular voteelectoral collegethe legislative branch
How did the Supreme Court cases help end segregation?

Analyze the map below and answer the question that follows. A satellite map of Europe. Areas on the map are circled and labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. 1 is Norway and Sweden. 2 is Denmark. 3 is Spain and Portugal. 4 is Italy. 5 is Greece. Image courtesy of NASA Which of the following peninsulas is located in region 3 on the map above? A. the Jutland Peninsula B. the Balkan Peninsula C. the Iberian Peninsula D. the Apennine Peninsula Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D

Answers

Answer:

Correct answer is C. the Iberian Peninsula

Explanation:

A is not correct as Denmark, marked with number 2, is on the Jutland Peninsula.

B is not correct as Greece, marked with number 5 is on the Balkan Peninsula.

C is correct as Spain and Portugal, which are marked with number 3 are on the Iberian Peninsula.

D is not correct as Italy, marked with number 4 is on the Apennine Peninsula.

Answer:

the answer is c

Explanation:

Which statement below is consistent with the maturational view of motor development?a. Preterm infants reach motor milestones later than do full-term infants.

b. Infants who spend the first two years of life lying on their backs walk at later ages than other children.

c. Infants who practice the stepping reflex daily walk earlier than those who do not.

d. Infants who spend time lying on their stomachs each day will crawl earlier

Answers

Answer:

I think it's A Preterm infants reach motor milestones later than do full-term infants

Explanation:

Final answer:

The maturational view of motor development highlights the role of biological processes more than environmental influence. According to this view, motor development is driven by the maturation of the nervous system. Thus, the statement that preterm infants reach motor milestones later than full-term infants is consistent with this theory.The correct option is A.

Explanation:

The maturational view of motor development emphasizes inherent biological processes over environmental influence. It suggests that development is driven primarily by maturation of the nervous system, and thus, is not significantly influenced by individual experiences.

This does not mean that a certain amount of movement and practice isn't essential, but the maturation theory posits that this happens within the child's innate timetable.

From the given options, the statement that is consistent with the maturational view would be 'a. Preterm infants reach motor milestones later than do full-term infants.'

It is assumed under this theory that because preterm infants' nervous systems haven't matured to the same level as those of full-term infants, they will reach motor milestones later.The correct option is A.

Learn more about Maturational View of Motor Development here:

brainly.com/question/36779463

#SPJ2

Are interest groups good or bad for democracy? Defend and explain your answer.

Answers

Answer:

I believe that the best answer here lies somewhere in the middle. I believe that interest groups can be beneficial for society, and democracy in general, when they seek to ensure that a government really works towards the good of all people through their lobbying actions, but they can also be a bad thing when their purposes are only to benefit the group and not society at large. For example, when you take such interest groups as workers movements, you see this middle ground. Their protests, and lobbying in Congress, have ensured that policies in favor of laborers have been passed, improved, and maintained. In this instance, interest groups have exerted a positive influence on democracy. But, when they simply start to pressure for measures that can only benefit their particular group, to the detriment of other members of society, then, they are not so good.

There is also the issue that interest groups, especially when they become pretty powerful and influential, can begin to exert too much pressure and interfere with policies that have been good for the general public, but that do not benefit their particular interests. So in this case, interest groups are not too good for democracy. However, on the other side of that same coin, interest groups that seek to pressure for the benefit of the general population, to have policies in favor of such things as healthcare, social programs, etc., can be very beneficial to democracy.

Finally, interest groups are a way in which the people in a country can have influence on their government, aside from representatives that are elected. These groups, if they have elected officials, can exert pressure so that the people´s interests, and desires, are met. It is a way to keep government balanced and within the scope of: rule for the people and by the people.

Final answer:

Interest groups can have both positive and negative impacts on democracy. They allow citizens to participate in the democratic process and advocate for their concerns, but can also exert undue influence and prioritize the interests of a wealthy minority.

Explanation:

Interest groups can have both positive and negative impacts on democracy. On one hand, they allow citizens to participate in the democratic process by advocating for their interests and concerns. Interest groups can provide valuable information to policymakers, promote public awareness and education, and help mobilize citizens to vote and engage in political activities. However, interest groups can also have a negative influence on democracy if they exert undue influence, engage in corruption or unethical practices, or disproportionately represent the interests of a wealthy minority. It is important to strike a balance between allowing interest groups to participate in democracy while maintaining transparency, accountability, and equal representation for all citizens.

Learn more about Impact of interest groups on democracy here:

brainly.com/question/32217869

#SPJ6

Who led the Bolsheviks and became the new leader of Russia?

Answers

Answer: Vladimir Lenin

Explanation:

Suppose a new customer adds $100 to his account at Midwestern Mutual Bank, which the owners of the bank then use to make $100 worth of new loans. This would increase the loans account and the account.This would also bring the leverage ratio from its initial value of to a new value of .

Answers

Answer: 100:1

Explanation: the $100,000 worth of loan would increase the loan account by the same $100,000 and further reduce the cash account by $100,000. For lack of sufficient details, This would bring the leveraged ratio from an initial value of Nil to a new value of 100:1.

i know it but i dont understand

Does it matter that Groupon reported its weakness in internal controls as a disclosure control under SOX Section 302 rather than pointing it out in its report on internal controls under Section 404

Answers

Yes, It is important because section 302 requires the CFO and CEO to attest to the financial statement's fairness and the effectiveness of the internal controls system (ICS).

What is the purpose of SOX, Section 302 and 404?

The purpose of Section 404 is for management to quantify internal control failures throughout the year.

Reporting such a deficit under section 302 is not wholly out of context, but it must first be mentioned under section 404 of the SOX legislation.

Because the SOX Act is primarily a rules-based approach to corporate governance, it is required that its provisions be scrupulously followed.

For more information about SOX and Section 302, 404, refer below

brainly.com/question/7443565

Answer:

It matters as section 302 is specifically meant for the CFO and the CEO to attest to fairness of financial statement and effectiveness of internal controls system

Explanation:

Section 404 is for the management to itemize internal control lapses in the course of the year.

It is not entirely out of context to  report such deficiency under section 302 but it must have first of all be  pointed out under section 404 of the SOX act

Since SOX act is mostly  rules-based approach to corporate governance framework, it is expected that its provisions be adhered to strictly.