Answer:

The **angles **of **rotation **that would **not map** the figure onto itself will **not **be the **multiple **of **40 **and this can be determined by evaluating the possible **angle **of **each rotation**.

Given :

- A nonagon is a nine-sided polygon.
- A regular nonagon was rotated about its center point.

To determine **angels **of **rotation **that would **not map **the figure onto **itself**, first, evaluate the **possible angle **of **each rotation**.

To determine the possible **angle **of **each rotation **the following calculation can be used:

The possible **angle **of **each****rotation **is the **ratio **of the complete **rotation **to the number of **sides**.

Each Rotation =

So, the **angles **of **rotation **that would **not map** the figure onto itself will **not **be the **multiple **of **40**.

For more information, refer to the link given below:

Answer:

**Answer:**

See Explanation

**Step-by-step explanation:**

**Given**

**Required**

Angles of rotation that would not map the shape on itself

Side of a nonagon is:

and a complete rotation is:

To start with, we calculate a possible angle of each rotation:

This is calculated by dividing the complete rotation by number of sides

**The question lacks option; so, it's difficult to give a specific answer.**

**However, I'll give a generalized answer**

For the nonagon to map on itself, the angle must be a multiple of the **calculated angle of rotation (40)**

**i.e.**

**Any angle different from the above listed angles (or any other multiple of 40 not listed above) answers the question.**

Transformations,, I have no clue what to do :(

What’s the correct answer for this?

Question 2Explain the difference between the graphs y = x3 and y = 3(x – 4)3 + 7.

The number of new bicycles must be more than 13 times the number of new treadmills. Each bicycle costs $340 and each treadmill costs $670. He must spend less than $5,650. Select all of the constraints for this situation. a) y>13x b)340x+670y≤5650 c)y>0 340x+670y<5650 d) x>13y x>0

How to work the problems and explain step by step by showing the work

What’s the correct answer for this?

Question 2Explain the difference between the graphs y = x3 and y = 3(x – 4)3 + 7.

The number of new bicycles must be more than 13 times the number of new treadmills. Each bicycle costs $340 and each treadmill costs $670. He must spend less than $5,650. Select all of the constraints for this situation. a) y>13x b)340x+670y≤5650 c)y>0 340x+670y<5650 d) x>13y x>0

How to work the problems and explain step by step by showing the work

**Answer:**

135 times

**Step-by-step explanation:**

**Answer:**

135

**Step-by-step explanation:**

**Answer:**

226.08

**Step-by-step explanation:**

im pretty sure

**Answer:**

whats the question?

**Step-by-step explanation:**

**Answer:**

The sample size needed if the margin of error of the confidence interval is to be no more than 0.02.

n= 2015

**Step-by-step explanation:**

Given the customer relations department will survey a random sample of customers and compute a 95% confidence interval for the proportion that are dissatisfied

Given data from past studies, they believe that this proportion will be about 0.28

The proportion of success(p) = 0.28

We know that the margin of error of 95% of intervals of given proportion

margin of error = …(i)

Given margin of error = 0.02

Substitute values in equation (i) cross multiplication √n

0.02 √n = 2√0.28X0.72

On calculation, we get √n = 44.89

squaring on both sides, we get

n = 2015

__ Conclusion__:-

The sample size needed if the margin of error of the confidence interval is to be no more than 0.02.

n= 2015

**Answer: 43 cm**

**Step-by-step explanation:**

The perimeter of rectangle is given by :-

, where l is length and w is width of the rectangle.

**Given :** The length of rectangle is 17.5 cm and the width is 40 mm in cm.

Since , 1 cm = 10 mm

Then, 40 mm=

**Then, the perimeter of rectangle will be :-**

**Hence, the perimeter of rectangle = 43 cm**

**Answer:**

**11,960,000 populations.**

**Step-by-step explanation:**

Population of California at year 2005 = 36.8 million

If the population is growing at annual rate of 1.3%, then yearly increment will be:

1.3% of 36.8 million

= 1.3% of 36,800,000

= 1.3/100 * 36,800,000

= 1.3 * 368,000

= 478,400

The number of yeas between 2005 and 2030 is 25years

The population increase between 2005 and 2030 will be 25 * 478,400

**= 11,960,000**

**Hence the population would have increased by 11,960,000 populations between 2005 and 2030**

Using the compound interest formula commonly used in mathematics, the population of California is expected to increase by approximately 13.04 million between 2005 and 2030, assuming an annual growth rate of 1.3%.

The problem here is related to **compound interest** in mathematics. Here, the population of California is growing annually at a rate of 1.3%, which means it's compounding, much like interest in a bank. To calculate the growth in population from 2005 to 2030, or 25 years, we can use the formula for compound interest which is P(1 + r/n)^(nt), where P is the initial population, r is the annual growth rate, n is the number of times the population grows per year, and t is the time in years.

In this case, P is 36.8 million, r is 1.3% or 0.013, n is 1 (since the population grows once a year), and t is 25 (the number of years from 2005 to 2030). If we plug these values into the formula, we get: **36.8(1 + 0.013/1)^(1*25)**.

This simplifies to a population of approximately 49.84 million in 2030. Therefore, the population **increase** over those 25 years is: 49.84 million - 36.8 million = **13.04 million**.

#SPJ3