# Twenty percent of the town's population is over the age of 65. If there are 320 residents over the age of 65, what is the town's total population?

There are 1600 residents.

Step-by-step explanation:

0.2 times x = 320  divide by 0.2

x = 1600

65

Step-by-step explanation:

I think. hope this hepls

## Related Questions

What are 567 times 3

1,701

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph shows the distance, y, that a car traveled in x hours: A graph is shown with the x-axis title as Time in hours. The title on the y-axis is Distance Traveled in miles. The values on the x-axis are from 0 to 5 in increments of 1 for each grid line. The values on the y-axis are from 0 to 325 in increments of 65 for each grid line. A line is shown connecting ordered pairs 1, 65 and 2, 130 and 3, 195 and 4, 260. The title of the graph is Rate of Travel. What is the rate of change for the relationship represented in the graph? (1 point) fraction 1 over 65 fraction 1 over 64 64 65

The rate of change is 65 miles per hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

The rate of change is the slope, m. To find the slope, use any pair of points.

We will use points (1, 65) and (2, 130).

The rate of change is 65 miles per hour.

I doing this so you can give the other person brainliest....

Step-by-step explanation:

THANKS

203.530 divided by 0.7=

Dnnsbdbshdvsbsbsbzsgbshsbdbbz

If two angles form a linear pair, then they are supplementary.

If two angles are supplementary, then the sum of their measures is 180∘.

Conclusion:

If two angles form a linear pair, then the sum of their measures is 180∘.

A The argument is valid by the law of detachment.

B The argument is valid by the law of syllogism.

C The argument is not valid because the conclusion does not follow from the premises.

D The argument is not valid because the premises are not true.

the answer is: The argument is valid by the law of syllogism.

Step-by-step explanation:

thanks for the wrong answer other guy.

The argument mentioned in the question is valid by the Law of Syllogism in mathematics, which says that if 'if p then q' and 'if q then r' are two implications then 'if p then r' can be deduced from them.

### Explanation:

In the context of this question, the correct answer would be (B) The argument is valid by the law of syllogism. The Law of Syllogism states that if we have two conditionals, 'if p then q' and 'if q then r', and and q is the same in both, then we can deduce a new conditional 'if p then r'.

In this case:

• 'p' is 'two angles form a linear pair'
• 'q' is 'they are supplementary'
• 'r' is 'the sum of their measures is 180∘'

So, 'if p then q' is 'If two angles form a linear pair, then they are supplementary', 'if q then r' is 'If two angles are supplementary, then the sum of their measures is 180∘'. Therefore, we can deduce the new conditional 'If two angles form a linear pair (p), then the sum of their measures is 180∘ (r)', which is the conclusion mentioned.

brainly.com/question/24760664

#SPJ2

How to divide this? WITH SOLUTION​ i need the answer pls​s​

Step-by-step explanation:Please mark me as the brainlyest

Pls help I will give brainiest answer.