Hamedah fled from an abusive relationship to her cousin's home at age 21 and says she regrets her decision to run errands for her cousin related to crack cocaine. Which goal of punishment presumes that citizens will choose not to commit a crime because they have observed the punishments that criminals have received, and they will conclude that the costs of crime


Answer 1

Answer: a. General deterrence


The General deterrence goal of punishment stems from the belief that if a person sees another person punished for doing something, they will not do that same thing in order to avoid punishment.

For instance, if a person sells crack cocaine and are caught by the police, they will be taken to a court of law and if found guilty, sentenced to a prison term. The general deterrence goal behind that is that when people like Hamedah see people who sell crack cocaine going to jail, they will avoid selling crack cocaine in order to avoid going to jail as well.

Related Questions

James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards, Inc Radical Boards is a surf and skateboard shop that also sells clothing. While employed there, Radical Board's principal shareholder discovered that Keller had created peep holes in the shop's dressing rooms. When confronted with the peep holes, Keller denied ever using them and indicated that they were there to prevent shoplifting. The shop manager was told to fire Keller. Shortly after Keller left, a 16-year-old and her mother filed suit because the teen learned, through conversations with Keller, that he had seen her in the dressing room while she was trying on swimming suits. Keller was able to describe her not-generally-seen birthmarks to her. Keller has applied for a position at a summer camp for girls, ages 14-18. The camp director had called Radical Board's manager and asked for a reference on Keller. A) Radical Board has no liability if it simply verifies Keller's employment there. B) Radical Board has liability for its failure to prosecute Keller. C) Radical Board has no liability for the actions of employees beyond their job description. D) Radical Board enjoys a privilege against defamation if it discloses the peep hole story. E)None of the above
What is needed to prove that there is defamation as is suggested by shelly and tony?
Project: Lulu the Runaway DogProject Part A: Lulu the Runaway Dog Let's review the runaway dog example. When you see Lulu escape, you shout, "Come back, Lulu!" but Lulu the Labrador has already run through one neighbor's yard and is racing down the street. You decide that pursuing her in your fuel-efficient Focus would be the best course of action. However, you can't possibly end your phone conversation. After all, you are discussing the latest Dame Daisy video and analyzing it minute by minute. With your phone in one hand, car keys in the other, you rev up your car and head off to find Lulu. Jamie, Lulu's ten-year-old owner whom you are also babysitting, jumps in the car with you. As you are driving (a little faster than the speed limit) and talking on your phone, an annoying fly starts to buzz around your head. You shake your head and as you refocus and look ahead, there is Lulu—right in front of your car. You slam on your brakes and turn the wheels of the car sharply to the right with all your might to avoid hitting Lulu. A motorist opposite you drives onto the curb and bangs up the side of his car as he avoids hitting your vehicle. You slam into a utility pole, which was badly in need of repair, and knock it down. The pole hits a tree that smashes into a house and severely damages the front porch. Luckily, Lulu is fine. So is the motorist, who is very angry. Jamie is complaining that her wrist feels like it is all twisted. You cannot help thinking, "Oh boy, am I in trouble!" But you are "just a kid," right? Where do you start to sort out this mess? You start by contacting your cousin, Marjorie, who is a first-year law student at State University. You tell her every little detail you remember, including all events leading up to the accident. She wants to help you determine to whom you may have owed a duty of care and to whom you breached this duty. She sends you an email with the questions listed below. Please answer them. Marjorie's Questions: Who was involved in the accident? Did you owe a duty to anyone? If so, what duty or duties and to which particular individuals? Which duties did you breach? Were your actions the cause of any injuries? Were you actions an actual cause or a proximate cause, or both? For what damages could you be held liable? Are there any defenses against potential plaintiffs? If so, what are they? Provide a brief four- to five-paragraph answer. Project Part B: A Fire near Gidgits Galore Gidgits Galore borders a privately owned ten-acre forest. Pete owns the land. It is zoned "mixed," so businesses and residences can be found throughout the neighborhood. Through the forest is a multiresidence apartment building. Danny, a high-school senior who lives in one of the apartments, has crammed all night for his economics final and needs a break. He has decided to take a morning walk down one of the forest's paths, prodding the piles of leaves and clumps of moss with his walking stick. He sees what appeared to be a recently-used campfire, and pokes around it with his stick. As he wanders farther, he doesn't realize that he has reignited the fire. To make matters worse, it is unexpectedly windy that day. As the wind picks up, the flames leap over 200 feet to a storage shed used by the apartment building's maintenance workers. One of them, Don, has just arrived to get his lawnmower. He calls 911. While waiting, he tries to extinguish the flames with his jacket, but he stops when his work shirt catches fire. The flames also reach the tent of Cassie, the camper who lit the campfire the previous night. Cassie thought she had extinguished the fire as she set up her tent nearby. Cassie wakes up coughing from smoke inhalation and manages to exit the tent before it is destroyed by fire. One of Gidgits Galore's managers, Dianne, arrives to open up the store but is detoured by the smoke she sees in the distance. Soon she too is overwhelmed by its acrid smell, which brings on a severe asthma attack. As quickly as the flames started, the wind stops, and they die down. Firefighters who arrive on the scene are able to quickly extinguish the fire. You are a member of a mock jury in a negligence case. As a juror, one of your duties is to find the facts from the evidence presented and determine if there is enough evidence to show that the defendant was negligent. Sort out the facts in the present case. Prepare a brief argument (three to four paragraphs) outlining why Danny could be held negligent against the potential plaintiffs listed below. Don the maintenance worker Cassie the camper Dianne the GidgitsGalore employee Pete the landowner Prepare a brief argument (two to three paragraphs) showing why Danny's conduct did not amount to negligence against any of the potential plaintiffs listed above.
Which statement describes Max Weber's theory about power? a Power is distributed among many different elites and many government institutions, and no one elite or institution ever dominates government. b Power is held by an economic elite, the people who control the "means of production." c Power is concentrated among a "power elite" of top soldiers, bureaucrats, and businesspeople. d Power is held by bureaucrats and administrators.
What are the benefits and drawbacks of selecting judges through popular elections? Can a judge who considers herself or himself a Republican or a Democrat render fair and impartial justice?

Why did anti-communist legislators view hollywood as a major concern?


Anti-communist legislators in the United States during the Cold War era viewed Hollywood as a major concern due to their perception of the entertainment industry as a potentially powerful tool for spreading communist propaganda.

They believed that Hollywood actors, directors, and writers were sympathetic to the communist cause and could use their influence to sway public opinion in favor of communism. This fear was exacerbated by the fact that many Hollywood figures were politically active and outspoken, particularly during the 1930s and 1940s when leftist politics were more popular. In response to these concerns, anti-communist legislators launched investigations into Hollywood in the late 1940s and early 1950s, seeking to root out supposed communist sympathizers and expose any subversive activities taking place within the industry. These investigations, which included the notorious House Un-American Activities Committee hearings, resulted in the blacklisting of many prominent Hollywood figures and had a chilling effect on the entertainment industry for many years.

Learn more about communist from here:



Who was the first hispanic to serve on the supreme court


The first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States was Sonia Sotomayor. Born on June 25, 1954, in the Bronx, New York, Sotomayor has Puerto Rican heritage.

She had a distinguished legal career before her appointment to the Supreme Court, serving as a federal district judge and then a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

President Barack Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and she was confirmed by the Senate in August 2009. Sotomayor's appointment marked a historic moment, as she became the first Hispanic and third woman to serve on the nation's highest court.

Learn more about Sonia Sotomayor:



Final answer:

Sonia Sotomayor was the first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court. She was nominated in 2009 by President Obama.


The first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court was Sonia Sotomayor. She was nominated by President Barack Obama and confirmed in 2009. She was nominated in 2009 by President Obama. Born to Puerto Rican parents in the Bronx, New York, Sotomayor has a long career in law, including serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit prior to her appointment to the Supreme Court. The first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court was Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

Learn more about Hispanic Supreme Court here:



Do you think my girl will marry me



positively,yea, i'm getting married after all this coronavirus cr.ap ends.

so i'm pretty sure

Answer: no you have a shrimp, but sometimes the truth hurts, and if you dont have a shrimp for a peen send me a pic on snap Thelitgoat69


What is the function of the Judicial Branch?Enforce the Law

Make the Law

Execute the Law

Interpret the Law and settle disputes​



to settle legal disputes and determine the constitutionality of laws


Answer: The judicial branch is in charge of deciding the meaning of laws.

Explanation: Their whole purpose is basically to apply laws to real situations, and whether a law breaks the rules of the Constitution.

Judicial Branch are kind of like the Jury in the court.  They are responsible for protecting the rights of the people. They give power to the people. They Have The Power to Get Its Decisions and Judgments Enforced.  These are some of the many functions of the Judicial Branch.

News coverage that is manipulated (managed) by a campaign manager or political consultant to gain media exposure for a political candidate.



Managed news coverage refers to the practice of manipulating media coverage for the benefit of a political candidate. This can be done through a variety of tactics, such as planting stories in the media, organizing media events, and working with journalists to shape the way that a candidate or campaign is covered. Managed news coverage can be a powerful tool for political campaigns, as it allows them to control the narrative and present their candidate in a favorable light. However, it can also be controversial, as it can involve manipulating or misleading the public and may be seen as a form of propaganda. It is important for journalists and the public to be aware of the potential for managed news coverage and to be cautious when evaluating media coverage of political candidates.

Your opinion on Free public transport for senior citizens.



Free public transport for senior citizens, thats good because as they get older they most probably can't drive vehicle themselves and most of them maybe poor.

senior citizens are the people who worked for years to make this world as it looks now. they helped this new generations to come up.

so they should get free public transport facilities.

It’s honestly being respectful to our elders. They most likely should have free public transportation