What impact did the Renaissance have on European society?
The population was growing wealthier, which increased trade, travel, and the dissemination of new ideas. Along with an increasing interest in education, the arts renaissance was aided by the rise in prosperity, which also encouraged scientific advancements and new inventions.
What was one way the Renaissance changed European society?
Humanism was a school of thought that emerged during the Renaissance. Humanism promoted the notion that people should value their achievements in education, the classical arts, literature, and science because they are the center of their own universe. This is just one of its many tenets.
From the 14th to the 17th centuries, the Renaissance, which originated in Italy and spread to the rest of Europe, brought back classical culture. The thinkers, creators, and scholars who emerged during this time period had a profound impact on politics, science, religion, literature, philosophy, art, music, and other fields as well.
They expanded and interpreted them, creating their own style of art, philosophy and scientific inquiry.
The Renaissance was a fervent period of European cultural, artistic, political and economic “rebirth” following the Middle Ages. Generally described as taking place from the 14th century to the 17th century, the Renaissance promoted the rediscovery of classical philosophy, literature and art.
Why did many Americans consider the work of political bosses such as George Washington Plunkitt to be more about politics than philanthropy?Political bosses helped people in need because they supported the Social Gospel movement. Political bosses helped people in need because they would profit from it by winning votes or receiving payoffs. Political bosses helped people in need because many of their parents were immigrants and they understood hardship. Political bosses helped people in need because they received publicity in newspapers and political cartoons.
The correct answer is B) political bosses helped the people in need because they would profit from it by winning votes or receiving payoffs.
Many Americans considered the work of political bosses such as George Washington Plunkitt to be more of politics than philanthropy because political bosses helped the people in need because they would profit from it by winning votes or receiving payoffs.
A political boss is a leader in a political party so powerful that can control decisions and votes. George Washington Plunkitt was a member of the United States Senate for many years and became a powerful and wealthy man benefitting from his position in government. He liked to do favors that later benefited him. Many Americans considered the work of political bosses such as George Washington Plunkitt to be more of politics than philanthropy.
the correct answer is B
The capture of Port Royal by Union forces in 1861 that had the biggest impact on Union strategy of?
Blockading Charleston Harbor
Edwards v. South Carolina focused on two issues: the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances and
D. the right to peacefully assemble
freedom of assembly. The right to hold public meetings and form associations without interference by the government. Freedom of peaceful assembly is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
the right to peacefully assemble
mark as brainliest?
The philosophies of malcolm x and martin luther king are best described assomewhat similar drastically different somewhat different very similar
Look down below at the picture.
Answer on edge is drastically different.
You're welcome ♡
Their methods were drastically different Malcom X was an activist of the Muslim faith and challenged Dr. Kings Christian like non-violent methods. X urged his followers to defend themselves against "White aggression"
Help please1. Cyrus the Great was a powerful leader. His subjects rarely rebelled against him. Based on what you know about him, why do you think this was the case?
Here are some possible reasons why Cyrus the Great’s subjects rarely rebelled: