a. Find the height of the ball above the ground 2 seconds after it is released.

b. Find the height of the ball above the ground 4 seconds after it is released.

Please show work!

Answer:

**Answer with Step-by-step explanation:**

The height of the ball from the ground as a function of time is given by

The height of the ball at any instant of time can be found by putting the value of time 't' in the above relation as

**Part a)**

Height of ball after 2 seconds it is released is

**Part b)**

Height of ball after 4 seconds it is released is

Answer:

**Answer:**

Part a)

Height of ball after 2 seconds it is released is

h(2)=-16\times 2^2+80\times 2+4=100feet

Part b)

Height of ball after 4 seconds it is released is

h(4)=-16\times 4^2+80\times 4+4=68feet

**Step-by-step explanation:**

Help me please!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the perimeter of a triangle is 47.678cm two of the sides have lengths of 15.463cm and 11.34cm what is the length of the other side?

write the equation of a line that is parallel to y = -7/5x + 6 and that passes through the point (2, -6)

A manufacturer claims that only 1% of their computers are defective, but in a sample of 600 3% were found to be defective. If the 1% claim were true there would be less than 1 chance in 1000 of getting this number of defects in the sample. Is there statistically significant evidence against the manufacturer's claim? Why or why not?No, because the difference between a 1% and a 3% defect rate is insignificant. Yes, because the source of the data was unbiased. Yes, because the results are unlikely to occur by chance. No, because the sample size was too small to reach a conclusion.

Use the slope-intercept form to Graph y=-1/8x+2

the perimeter of a triangle is 47.678cm two of the sides have lengths of 15.463cm and 11.34cm what is the length of the other side?

write the equation of a line that is parallel to y = -7/5x + 6 and that passes through the point (2, -6)

A manufacturer claims that only 1% of their computers are defective, but in a sample of 600 3% were found to be defective. If the 1% claim were true there would be less than 1 chance in 1000 of getting this number of defects in the sample. Is there statistically significant evidence against the manufacturer's claim? Why or why not?No, because the difference between a 1% and a 3% defect rate is insignificant. Yes, because the source of the data was unbiased. Yes, because the results are unlikely to occur by chance. No, because the sample size was too small to reach a conclusion.

Use the slope-intercept form to Graph y=-1/8x+2

Answer:

(A)

Null hypothesis: Newspaper circulation in the city per day was = 15,000 in 2010

(B)

Alternative hypothesis: Newspaper circulation in the city today is > 15,000

(C)

Type 1 Error: This is the rejection of a true null hypothesis. It is the acceptance of the alternative hypothesis when the null hypothesis is true.

(D)

Type 2 Error: This is the non-rejection of a false null hypothesis. It is the acceptance of a null hypothesis when it is false.

Step-by-step explanation:

In statistical theory, the complete absence of any of these errors is virtually impossible.

number.

The sum of a rational number and an irrational number is

an (A:a rational) or (B: a irrational)

number.

~~~ZoomZoom44~~~~

**Answer:**

Its B

**Step-by-step explanation:**

approximate length of BC

5+5 x 8 dodn yes ok ok i agree

**Answer:**

**Step-by-step explanation:**

**Remark**

You could do it a very convoluted way or you could do it simply. The simple way, I think, is the one intended. The x on the second equation is sitting by it itself. So is it in the first equation. Put the x from the first equation into the second.

**Solution**

x=6y+3 ===> x+2y=5.

**6y + 3 + 2y = 5 First Step**

8y + 3 = 5 Subtract 3 from both sides

8y = 5 - 3 Combine

8y = 2 Divide by 8

y = 2/8

y = 1/4

============================

x = 6y + 3

x = 6*(1/4) + 3

x = 6/4 + 3

x = 1.5 + 3

x = 4.5

Solution (4.5 , 0.25)

**Answer:**

**x= 9/2 y=1,4 **

**Step-by-step explanation:**

Hope this helped you! :)

40 = 8 x 9

**Answer:**

72

**Step-by-step explanation:**

72 I KNOW THIS bye thanks

b. One-sided or two-sided test? Why?

c. Can it be concluded from these data that the population mean is less than 24 mm erythema?

d. What is the range on the p-value?

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a) We would use a t distribution because the population standard deviation is unknown.

b) it is a one sided test because we are trying to determine if the population mean is less than 24 mm erythema. The lesser than means that it is a left tailed test.

c) To determine the p value, we would apply the formula,

t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)

Where

x = sample mean = 21

µ = population mean = 24

s = samples standard deviation = 11

n = number of samples = 49

t = (21 - 24)/(11/√49) = - 1.91

Since n = 49

Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 49 - 1 = 48

We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes

p = 0.031

Assuming alpha = 0.05, then

Since alpha, 0.05 > than the p value, 0.031, then we would reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, At a 5% level of significance, it can be concluded from these data that the population mean is less than 24 mm erythema.

d) p value = 0.031